When I first started writing my first book The Stealing of Emily, I hardly realised how long it would take, what form it would be or what the real situation was. A similar situation is starting to emerge again with the advertisement of my book on social media. I was not ready for the feedback from the lovely people who liked the page on Facebook and poured their hearts out with the misery that these kidnappers had brought to their families. It was apparent from the outset that this process was going to itself have a story of its own.

From the inset this became interesting gathering all the figures and statistics and chasing the money to see whom the villain of the piece was. If you have not read the first book in this series it is amust to help you uderstand what it piled agaiast you to keep you from your child

Many of the posts to keep these pages alive were as worrying as the original “Thorpes Lost Children” which has found no resolution through our member of parliament whose options we are informed by Diane Hedditch at the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards said that there are around 650 options that a Member of Parliament can act on or choose to employ to help. When I asked what these were I was informed: “I went on to say that just as there are 650 MPs in Parliament, there are also likely to be 650 different ways that an MP might do their job …. I went on to say that just as there are 650 MPs in Parliament, there are also likely to be 650 different ways that an MP might do their job.” Well, you might find this amusing but even some of the UK Government ministers such as Bridgette Prentis the Parliamentary Under Secretary in 2009 are outspoken about the courts making statements in Hansard such as:
“There is some platitudinous advice on trusting solicitors and counsel. I would sooner entrust myself to a shoal of piranha as entrust myself to the legal fraternity on these matters. In the experience of many of us, they are thorough self-serving people”.
The Parliamentary Under Secretarys’ mantra through parliament specifically regarding ex parté hearings which she seemed to have little or no recourse or change to help the poor children or families that come into the net of these child abusers and child abductors. History seems to have a habit of repeating and all while this industry is funding billions of pounds of commerce built on the immoral earnings of children’s misery.
“If I told you there was a certain organization that wanted to do your family harm. What would you say?”

If I then told you this organisation was handing out plans and flow charts for every family law eventuality and giving directions to your opponent how to get out of it, to take your child. What would you say?”.

Would you believe me? Well read on!